Most Active Stories
- Grizzly Bear That Traveled 5,000 Miles Across Idaho, Montana Is A Mystery To Biologists
- Idaho Paraglider Could Be National Geographic's Adventurer Of The Year
- Data Points To Early Signs Of An Ada County Housing Bubble
- TV On The Radio To Headline Boise's Treefort Music Fest, Ticket Prices Increase
- Why Idaho Has Largest Share Of Unauthorized Immigrants Impacted By Obama Action
Mon July 23, 2012
Tolerable Risk Vs. Terrible Catastrophe: Dams And The Big One
It's a question all of us face sooner or later: whether to spend a good chunk of money to protect against a catastrophe that has a very low chance of occurring. A workshop that just wrapped up in Corvallis, Oregon considered that dilemma in the context of Northwest dams and a magnitude 9 earthquake.
Oregon, Washington and the federal Bureau of Reclamation have prioritized which dams they're most concerned about in case the Big One hits. For the feds, it's Scoggins Dam, 25 miles west of Portland. Brian Becker is chief of Reclamation's dam safety program. He's concerned the earthen dam could fail in a megaquake.
"We're in the range where the probability of failure is around one in 1,000 to one in 10,000 in any given year," Becker says. "It does sound like a very low risk, but..."
But Becker says if the dam gave way, it would have life-threatening consequences for people downstream. So Becker's division is currently analyzing the economics and the options for reinforcing this dam.
A handful of municipal and private dam owners on the Oregon Coast, in Western Washington and British Columbia are beginning similar investigations.
Copyright 2012 Northwest News Network